There is no one who wants divorce, but due to some factors they have to opt for the divorce. Most of the laws are legislated at the federal level, but the laws related to divorce are legislated on the state basis. The best divorce lawyers offer quick divorce facility and enable both the parties to move on with their separate lives. Attorney can helps you in dealing with all issues related to divorce.
The various Federal and State agencies refer to the non custodial "dead beat" parent as "turnips", further de-humanizing them and making them an easier target for discrimination. The unfair treatment of non custodial parents has spawned the website:
With the belief that there are other better ways to solve divorce issues than fighting in court, the orange county divorce lawyer offers very sensible compromises that can bring about an amicable divorces without going to court. The divorce lawyer in Orange County is famous for providing very affordable divorce mediation service in about thirty days. Most of the cases handled by the lawyer begin as litigation, but end in reasonable settlement between the couples. The lawyer is always ready to negotiate for mediation so that the case ends fast and saves you money and time. Divorce is after all, a very painful and vulnerable time for the couple, so the sooner matters are resolved, the faster they can get on with their new life.
This court held that if the Virginia circuit court had found that Mrs. D'Agnese took the children to Illinois simply to obtain jurisdiction in that state and not to protect them from abuse, it could have refused, under Middleton, to defer to the Illinois court pursuant to Code § 20-129(A). However, the court did not do so, but found instead that the Illinois court had obtained emergency jurisdiction. The circuit court therefore had no basis to refuse to defer to the Illinois court pursuant to Code § 20-129(A). The Illinois court's exercise of emergency jurisdiction, which is temporary in nature, did not necessarily confer permanent jurisdiction over the custody issue. Indeed, a court that exercises emergency jurisdiction is generally required to defer to the court with the stronger claim to jurisdiction, usually the court in the home state. However, because the Virginia court was required to defer to the Illinois court under Code § 20-129(A), it was for the Illinois court to determine whether its continued exercise of jurisdiction was appropriate. The Illinois court found that it had obtained personal jurisdiction over Mr. D'Agnese and consolidated the divorce and the emergency custody proceedings. The court issued orders on both dissolution and custody, and Mr. D'Agnese's appeal was dismissed. The Illinois order is now final, and that order cannot be collaterally attacked in the Virginia courts. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the court assuming jurisdiction over the custody of the children is reversed, and the visitation order vacated. The case is remanded to the trial court for any further proceedings consistent with this opinion.